[Mael-list] Re: Stealing Sparks

[Sue Harris, Republic Media]

Perhaps in future this debate would be negated by me not having the video streamed 4 months upfront and telling everyone about it!

A lesson learnt

Republic Media
Studio 202, Westbourne Studios
242 Acklam Road
London W10 5JJ
www.republicmedia.net

Tel: +44 20 8960 7449
Fax: +44 20 8960 7524



-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert" <megacalm at hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:33:40 
To:<mael-list at core.kuci.org>
Subject: [Mael-list] Re: Stealing Sparks

> If you are taking something from the net that is meant for watching only
and
> then distributing it, it's theft. If you went into a cinema with a camera
> and used that excuse when you were caught copying a movie for 'the
efficent
> storing and sharing of movies', it wouldn't get you very far...

Bad analogy. A movie theatre is a closed environment where admission is
charged for access. The net is not a closed environment, providing open
access.
>

> I'm not an innocent here, I and I don't necessarily agree with the notion
of
> piracy, but until the law changes, taking stuff you've not paid for which
> is not meant to be owned by you is theft.

Don't buy it (no pun intended). This law as you call it is open to
intrepretation in differant countries, as in Canada and Russia, and even
France.  So if you want to stick with your restrictive interpretations go
for it, but I find it excessively moralistic and preachy. And for any artist
(and record company) that objects to the downloading and saving and copying
of sub-standard music in any form in their catolouge,   I call that attitude
piggish.

Robert

PS

Not everyone has broadband, and can get broadband, which IMO makes the
viewing of streaming videos restrictive and elitist.
_______________________________________________
Mael-list mailing list
Mael-list at lists.kuci.org
http://lists.kuci.org/mailman/listinfo/mael-list